Tom was on News 92 FM in Houston last week and sat down with Scott Braddock.
Tom discussed why Barack Obama's stimulus bill failed, his opposition to the administration's proposed 2013 budget, and answered questions on a wide range of subjects.
Take a listen: http://www.scottbraddock.com/2012/02/tomleppert/
$5.1 trillion of debt accumulated in four years. That's the Obama record.
Paying for the debt that President Obama has accumulated in four short years would cost the average American family $70,000. Each citizen in the country would be paying $17,000 just to fund the reckless spending of this administration.
And now the President is proposing a budget for 2013 that would increase the national debt by another $1.3 trillion.
But that's not all—the President also found a way to sneak in a $1.9 trillion tax hike—the largest in the country's history. Does anyone besides this President really believe increasing taxes is what our stagnant economy needs?
It's remarkable that the same presidential candidate who in 2008 claimed that increasing the debt ceiling was "unpatriotic" and "irresponsible" is now hypocritically embracing record budget deficits and adding trillions more to a national debt that is already crippling our economic future.
For years, Obama and the career politicians in Washington have given speeches and last minute election appeals promising to be responsible fiscal stewards, and all that's gotten us is $5 trillion more of debt. The rhetoric and reality don't line up and I need you to sign our petition to help to put a stop to the waste.
They have no problem running up the taxpayer's credit card while looking the other way when it's time to make tough spending cuts. I'll make sure that ends when I'm in the Senate.
I'm the only candidate in the race who has a detailed plan to stop Washington's addiction to debt.
My plan lays out bold, conservative proposals to pass a Balanced Budget Amendment, cap spending, and institute the budgetary reforms needed to hold the politicians in Washington accountable for spending our tax dollars responsibly.
Conventional wisdom in Texas politics says that a mayor can’t make the jump to winning a statewide race. Former Dallas Mayor Tom Leppert is trying to break that conventional wisdom and has quietly moved into the number two slot behind Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst. I sat down with him and discussed a wide range of issues and campaign strategy.
As for strategy, he really hasn’t changed anything major since the first time we chatted about it. He is still following the plan of using his strong name recognition in North and East Texas to get him to a runoff with the Lt. Gov. and then, as he says, anything can happen. He has run some targeted television spots in West and Central Texas to boost his name id. And he attends most of the candidate forums around the state, getting his message out to the grassroots even though he rarely reaches double-digits in the straw polls after most of the forums. When I questioned that strategy as a waste of time, he just smiled and said that he tries to get one or two attendees to support him at each meeting and that if you add them all up, it has been worth it.
In the endorsement arena, Mr. Leppert has locked up a surprising number of mayors. It may seem odd given that Lt. Gov. Dewhurst and Ted Cruz have gone after high profile endorsements but you have to remember that mayors invariably have a strong local network of supporters versus the high profile endorsements that depend upon free or paid media to get the word out. And mayors typically have a strong sense of the ability of someone in politics to get stuff done, not just talk about it.
But I suspect that the main reason that he is in a good position to reach a runoff is his record as Mayor of Dallas. There are the usual critics out there but when people look at the facts, they realize that he did manage to implement a conservative agenda that is still benefiting the city today. Two areas stand out.
The first area that stands out is the fact that he added more officers to the Dallas PD and reduced the crime rate. It seems like a no brainer but in these lean times, adding officers is an extremely hard task. Mr. Leppert did it by cutting workers in other, non-essential areas, or, as Mr. Leppert calls it, refocusing priorities. And it worked, as Politifact attests.
The other area in which he was successful, and which most likely helped reduce the crime rate, was in cleaning up abandoned buildings, both commercial and apartments. He did this by multi-functional teams and going into the abandoned properties, writing code violations, and notifying the owners that they had 30 days to clean them up or they would be fined. Mr. Leppert told me that in one case, the fire department crews wouldn’t enter the property without full haz mat suits. This may not sound like much to those who sit in glass houses for a living but if you have one of these crime-sores in your neighborhood, you instantly understand what Mr. Leppert was trying to do and appreciate it.
READ FULL STORY
